From strategic options to structured execution
Structure strategic choices as explicit alternatives with assumptions, dependencies, and success criteria. Compare options with multi-criteria analysis, scenario modeling, and stress testing — then track execution with leading indicators.
0+
Strategy Models
Scenario
Planning
Tested
Assumptions
Common pain points that structured decision models eliminate.
Annual strategy decks gather dust by Q2. Continuously assess strategic alignment and detect when execution diverges from intent before it costs a quarter.
Endless debate without structured evaluation. Score strategic options on viability, reversibility, timing, and resource requirements on the same framework.
Plans assume a single future. Model multiple scenarios with Monte Carlo simulation and stress testing to build strategies resilient to uncertainty.
Budget allocation doesn't reflect strategic priorities. Map every investment to strategic objectives with quantified impact scoring and trade-off analysis.
How leaders use DecisionLedger to make better decisions.
Evaluates 4 strategic options using the multi-criteria analysis model, scoring each on viability, reversibility, resource requirements, and time-to-impact — then presents the comparison to the board.
Strategic decisions backed by structured analysis, not consensus bias
Runs scenario planning with Monte Carlo stress testing across 3 market environments, identifying which strategic bets are resilient to uncertainty and which are fragile.
Strategy resilient to 95% of simulated market scenarios
Uses the trade-off analysis model to compare build vs. buy vs. partner options for a new capability, quantifying cost, speed, risk, and strategic fit on the same scale.
Build-vs-buy decisions completed in days instead of months of debate
Based on platform benchmarks across early adopters.
Strategic Decisions
Scenario Planning
Assumption Tracking
Strategy Reviews
Connects With
Pre-built decision models ready to run with your data.
Identifies which assumptions most influence the outcome and how changes to them could materially alter the decision.
Detects over-concentration of risk across decisions. Analyzes the aggregate portfolio of active decisions to identify clustering, correlation, and concentration risks that could amplify failures. Computes Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, category and risk-level concentration, timeline clustering, risk factor correlation, and portfolio balance scoring with rebalancing recommendations.
Model multiple future scenarios and stress test decisions against adverse conditions. Quantifies upside, downside, and base-case outcomes with probability-weighted expected values. Computes Value at Risk (VaR), Monte Carlo confidence intervals, scenario comparison matrices, sensitivity analysis, and risk-adjusted recommendations.
Scores how well a decision aligns to company objectives. Maps decisions against strategic pillars, OKRs, and values with weighted alignment scoring and gap analysis.
Compares strategic paths with quantified upside, downside, and execution risk. Evaluates multiple strategic options through financial, operational, and risk lenses to identify the most viable path forward. Computes expected monetary value, risk-adjusted EMV, asymmetry ratios, real options value, viability composite scores, dominance analysis, breakeven probabilities, and Monte Carlo confidence intervals.
Measures how far strategic intent deviates from operational reality. Compares planned vs actual across key dimensions to quantify execution drift and identify intervention points. Computes gap scores per objective, overall execution gap index, drift velocity, dimension gap analysis, at-risk objectives, intervention priority ranking, projected completion dates, and execution health score.
Flags decisions that are hard or impossible to undo. Evaluates the reversibility, timing sensitivity, and option value of deferral for each decision to prevent premature commitment to irreversible paths.
Explicitly surfaces opportunity cost between competing options. Quantifies what you gain and what you give up for each alternative using multi-criteria comparison with explicit cost-of-not-choosing analysis.
Three steps to structured, auditable decisions.
Structure strategic choices as explicit alternatives with assumptions, dependencies, and success criteria. Make implicit decisions explicit.
Run multi-criteria analysis, scenario modeling, and sensitivity testing. Compare options on the same structured, auditable framework.
Track strategy execution with leading indicators, detect assumption failures early, and run structured pivot-or-persist reviews.
Strategy consulting decks
$1M engagements that produce slides, not living models you can update when conditions change
Spreadsheet scenario planning
Single-point forecasts that assume one future instead of testing thousands
Generic BI dashboards
Backward-looking analytics that tell you what happened but not what to decide
Annual planning cycles
Once-a-year strategy exercises that can't adapt to mid-year disruptions